Regular readers of this blog will know that I take a pretty hard line on the idea that music can ‘just be free’ and that I take a fair share of flak for my position (see my previous post here for background).
Numerous sites, forums and discussion boards pride themselves on their ‘everything should be free stance’ and argue that only money grabbing cynical artists would ever take the side of record labels in the piracy debate. This is patently not the case. Last week’s statement on tackling piracy from a 100 UK artists illustrates that artists care about this. They understand that if people stop buying their music and download it for free that they simply won’t be able to be professional musicians anymore. I for one used to be a struggling recording artist, many years ago. I never made enough money from music sales to give up the day job, but I would have loved to be able to. Not so that I could be rich, but so that I could spend more time doing the thing I loved: making music.
It is easy to argue that if consumers want music for free that the industry will simply have to adapt and develop free business models. But we don’t like our favourite artists because they or their record labels are good business people. If the music industry proves inflexible enough to adapt to a free model and many professional artists go back to their day jobs who has won? If the music business (in whatever guise it may evolve – i.e. it doesn’t have to be record labels at the centre of it) locks into a race to the bottom, ultimately less money will filter back to the artists. That means that fewer artists will get contracts, and artists will have shorter careers. Many more aspiring artists than today will never make it out of their MySpace page or their day jobs.
One of the counter arguments used by commentators is that having a MySpace page is an ends in itself these days. No, it is a means to an end, and the VAST majority of artists see it that way. If an aspiring artist doesn’t get signed to a label / publisher / agent they’ll remain one of those many tens of thousands of artists struggling to stand out from the crowded pack on MySpace.
The majority of artists just want to play their music to their fans and to be able to make a living out of doing so. Most artists with record deals won’t and don’t make much money out of it, but they get to do what they love, and we get to enjoy their music. But that model breaks down if people stop paying for music, whether that be buying CDs, downloads, gig tickets, ring tones etc. And yes, of course, ‘feels like free’ models can pick up the slack, but they won’t do the job on their own, and they certainly won’t do enough whilst illegal free services continue to dominate.
But rather than try to persuade you with my words alone, please take the time to read this blog post from an artist that just felt the impact of file sharing (note this was recently reprinted in the UK’s Guardian by UK Music). This is the pain of a real life artist and reveals the fallacy of the music ‘must be free’ argument
http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=62653487&blogId=485944356
No comments:
Post a Comment